Skip to main content

Technical Leadership and Architecture Review

Independent review of an architecture, codebase or delivery approach, with findings ranked by consequence.

Enquire about this service

An outside read on whether a design will hold. I review the architecture, the data model, the security posture and the delivery practice, then report what I found with each item ranked by actual consequence rather than by style preference.

The report is written to be useful to both the engineering team and the people funding the work — findings are specific, evidenced, and separated into what must change, what should change, and what is a defensible choice I would have made differently.

Engagement process

  1. Access and context — codebase, documentation, and the questions you need answered
  2. Review — architecture, data model, security, tests and delivery practice
  3. Findings — written up and ranked by consequence
  4. Walkthrough — discussion with the team, not a delivered verdict
  5. Follow-up — optional re-review once changes are made
All services